Does this actually apply to my trust?
The new tax targets discretionary trusts specifically. Several other trust types, and certain types of income, are excluded. Here’s where each common situation lands.
Read the status before you read the detail. This is a Treasury consultation paper — released 8 July 2026 — and nothing more. No bill has been introduced. What is proposed is a minimum 30% tax on the taxable income of discretionary trusts from 1 July 2028, with CGT-free rollover relief to restructure. If it proceeds as drafted it would substantially undermine bucket company strategies. Our advice on this page is deliberately the same throughout: model your exposure now, restructure nothing yet.
The new tax targets discretionary trusts specifically. Several other trust types, and certain types of income, are excluded. Here’s where each common situation lands.
Everything in this section describes what the consultation paper proposes, not what the law says. Under it, the trustee would pay a minimum 30% tax on the trust’s taxable income, beneficiaries would still report distributions and receive a non-refundable credit, and the effective rate on trust income could not drop below 30%. Every element of this is capable of changing before a bill is introduced.
From 1 July 2028, trustees of discretionary trusts will calculate the trust’s taxable income and pay tax at a minimum of 30%. If a higher rate would otherwise apply (e.g. for undistributed income to non-residents), that higher rate continues.
Franking credits received by the trust must be used first to pay the minimum tax — before being passed to beneficiaries.
Individual beneficiaries (other than corporate beneficiaries) receive a non-refundable credit for the trustee’s tax. The credit can reduce their personal tax to zero, but it can’t generate a refund.
The practical effect: a beneficiary on a 0% or 16% marginal rate effectively pays 30% tax on the trust distribution — the same as the trustee paid — with no way to claim the difference back.
This is the most significant change for clients using bucket companies. From 1 July 2028, a corporate beneficiary that receives a distribution from a discretionary trust receives no credit for the trustee’s 30% tax.
The consultation paper goes further, and this is the point that matters most. It flags that a distribution to a corporate beneficiary could be taxed twice — once in the trust at the 30% minimum, and again in the company — with no credit to relieve the overlap. If it were enacted as drafted, that would not merely reduce the benefit of a bucket company; it would make the structure actively expensive.
It is also, in our view, the strongest single reason to wait. Double taxation of corporate beneficiaries is exactly the kind of drafting outcome that consultation exists to fix. Restructuring now, on the assumption it survives into law, would be acting on the harshest possible reading of a paper that has not yet become a bill.
Several specific types of income are not subject to the minimum tax even if the trust is a discretionary trust:
Primary production income; certain income relating to vulnerable minors; amounts subject to non-resident withholding tax; and income from assets of discretionary testamentary trusts existing at announcement.
The trust-to-company distribution strategy — cap tax at 25% by streaming profits to a bucket company — is the single most affected planning technique. Here’s the before and after.
Trust earns $100,000 and distributes it to a bucket company. The bucket company pays 25% tax on the distribution (small business rate), leaving $75,000 retained in the corporate beneficiary.
Profit stays at the 25% corporate rate indefinitely. When eventually paid out as a franked dividend, the franking credits flow to the ultimate shareholder, so the total tax cost is determined by the shareholder’s marginal rate when the funds finally leave the structure.
Net tax: 25% while held in the bucket company, with timing flexibility for when the personal tax is paid.
Trust earns $100,000. The trustee pays 30% minimum tax ($30,000) before the distribution. The bucket company then receives $100,000 of trust distribution but gets no credit for the $30,000 the trustee paid.
The bucket company is then taxed on the $100,000 distribution at the company rate. The same income is effectively taxed twice — once at the trust (30%), once again at the company (25%).
Effective tax: well above 30%. Bucket companies as a tax minimisation tool no longer work.
The Budget papers don’t address how the new rules interact with existing unpaid present entitlements (UPEs) already owed to corporate beneficiaries from earlier years. The legislation will need to clarify whether UPEs created before 1 July 2028 remain under the old treatment or are caught by the new rules.
For most clients with material existing UPEs, this is a watch-and-wait item until the draft legislation lands — restructuring now risks crystallising costs unnecessarily.
A small-business owner earning $300,000 a year. Comparing the same income through a discretionary trust before and after the change — and against operating through a company instead.
Kurt pays himself $100,000 as a salary (working in the business) and the trust has $200,000 of remaining taxable income. He distributes $50,000 to each of four extended family members on no other income, keeping the cash in the business.
| Kurt’s salary tax ($100k) | $22,567 |
| Beneficiary 1 ($50k, no other income) | $4,861 |
| Beneficiary 2 ($50k) | $4,861 |
| Beneficiary 3 ($50k) | $4,861 |
| Beneficiary 4 ($50k) | $4,861 |
| Total tax paid by family | $42,011 |
| Kurt’s salary tax ($100k) | $22,567 |
| Trustee min tax on $200k @ 30% | $60,000 |
| Beneficiary 1 ($50k) net tax | $0 |
| Beneficiary 2 ($50k) net tax | $0 |
| Beneficiary 3 ($50k) net tax | $0 |
| Beneficiary 4 ($50k) net tax | $0 |
| Total tax paid by family | $82,567 |
To make restructuring viable, the consultation paper proposes CGT-free rollover relief for three years — from 1 July 2027 to 30 June 2030 — for taxpayers moving out of a discretionary trust into a company or fixed trust. The scope appears broader than first expected: on the current paper it could be available to trusts of any size, not only small business trusts. That is a genuine improvement on the Budget-night position, and it is also still only a paper.
The proposed rollover relieves capital gains tax. It does nothing about transfer duty, which is a State tax. Moving assets — particularly Victorian real property — out of a discretionary trust and into a company or fixed trust can trigger duty at full ad valorem rates on the value transferred, and on a commercial property or a portfolio of them that is a six-figure cost arriving in the same year.
This is the most commonly missed number in any restructure discussion, and it is often large enough on its own to change the answer. Any restructure model that does not have a duty line in it is not a model. We would look at the duty position before anything else.
Moving out of a trust is a meaningful structural change. The benefits of the trust form — asset protection, flexibility for changing family circumstances, ability to stream income to genuinely different beneficiaries year-to-year — don’t go away just because the tax efficiency reduces.
A company offers the 25% rate but loses the streaming flexibility and changes the asset protection profile. A fixed trust preserves trust structure but locks in beneficial entitlements. The right choice depends on your business, your family, your time horizon and your succession plans — not just the headline tax rate.
There is no legislation to be finalised — there is a consultation paper. A restructure is expensive, slow and hard to reverse, and the measure it would be responding to may not survive consultation in its current form. Several preparation steps make sense now. Restructuring is not one of them.
This is a Treasury consultation paper released 8 July 2026, with no bill introduced and a proposed start two years away. Key details — the treatment of corporate beneficiaries, bucket company UPEs, franking credit interaction and the rollover scope — are unresolved, and the corporate beneficiary double-tax issue in particular looks like something consultation is meant to fix. Restructuring now means paying real transfer duty today to avoid a tax that does not yet exist.
You don’t need to act on it yet, but you do need to understand the maths for your specific situation. The size of your existing UPEs, your distribution patterns and your family’s tax positions all change the answer.
Trusts that stream income to a non-earning spouse, adult children at uni, or retired parents have relied on those beneficiaries’ lower marginal rates. Those distributions will effectively be taxed at 30% from 1 July 2028 with no rebate available.
Primary production income is excluded, but non-PP income earned by the same trust is still affected. Mixed-use trusts — farming plus investment income, for example — will need separate analysis.
The next real milestone is an exposure draft or a bill. Until one appears, nothing on this page is capable of being acted on with confidence. We are tracking it and will contact affected clients when there is something concrete to respond to.
Testamentary trusts existing at 12 May 2026 are grandfathered. New testamentary trusts from estates of those who die after announcement will be subject to the minimum tax. There’s now a real planning advantage to having a Will with testamentary trust provisions in place.
If a restructure ever becomes the right answer, Victorian transfer duty will usually be the largest single cost of doing it — and the proposed CGT rollover does not relieve it. Knowing that number now tells you whether restructuring is even on the table for you. We can scope it without committing you to anything.
There is no trust minimum tax. There is a consultation paper about one — released by Treasury on 8 July 2026, proposing a 1 July 2028 start. No bill has been introduced as at 28 August 2026. The start date, the 30% rate, the scope and the mechanics can all change, and the measure may not proceed.
This page cannot give you a clean answer about what your trust will pay in 2028-29, because nobody can. What we can do is model your exposure under the paper as it stands, price the transfer duty on any restructure you might contemplate, and make sure you are not caught unprepared if it lands. That is a conversation worth having now. A restructure is not.
Testamentary trusts in existence at 12 May 2026 are grandfathered from the new tax. New ones created from future estates are not. For clients without a current Will, or whose existing Will doesn’t include testamentary trust provisions, there’s a real and time-limited advantage to acting before the next succession event. We can help.
Most trust clients also run a business, hold investments or have an SMSF. Other Budget changes interact with the trust changes in ways worth understanding.
Permanent $20,000 write-off and loss carry-back passed Parliament 19 August 2026. PAYG changes announced only.
Read about small business changes If this appliesNow law. Losses quarantined from 1 July 2027 — but property held at 12 May 2026 is grandfathered.
Read about property changes If this appliesNow law from 1 July 2027. The 50% discount is replaced with CPI indexation and a 30% minimum tax.
Read about CGT changes If this appliesDivision 296 from 1 July 2026 affects balances over $3 million. SMSFs are exempt from the trust minimum tax.
Read about SMSF changes If this appliesAll law: the rate cut on the $18,201–$45,000 bracket, the $1,000 instant deduction and the $250 offset.
Read about employee changes If this appliesThe private health rebate cut for over-65s is a bill before Parliament, not law. CGT changes and Division 296 are law.
Read about retirement changesThe trust minimum tax is a meaningful change, but the right response depends on your business, your family, your succession plans and your time horizon. We help clients understand the options before they need to choose — not after.